Blog Layout

Towards An Intersectional Lens on Cannabis Criminal Justice Reform

Mikelina Belaineh • November 2, 2022

LPP's Director of Impact is working to  facilitate a more inclusive cannabis justice conversation by exploring the ways key voices and perspectives are overlooked.

Our current cannabis justice movement suffers from a major pedagogical problem


“Pedagogy” (noun)


  1. the method and practice of teaching, especially as an academic subject or theoretical concept.

 


A pedagogical problem refers to a problem dealing with how we conceptualize, teach, and talk about something– in this instance, the issue of cannabis justice.


More specifically, cannabis justice research– which we rely on– suffers from an incomplete framework for analysis. All of us– community members, movement leaders, and decision-makers – should care about research because it directly impacts our ability to understand and solve our problems. Leading cannabis justice research and rhetoric, like most dominant justice research and rhetoric, fails to consider the implications of intersectionality. More specifically, the research we count on to guide our cannabis justice movement excludes the voices and experiences of Womxyn and Lgbtq+ communities (*not mutually exclusive*). 


This exclusion– or oversight– is a major mistake. Folks who are multiply marginalized by systems of cannabis criminalization have distinctive experiences and narratives resulting from their holding intersecting identities of race, gender, and sexuality. Meaning– when you are Black & womxyn, or brown & trans, or indigenous & queer– you experience systems of policing and punishment distinctively and differently. Failing to consider experiences that society deems “non-normative” contributes to a critical misrepresentation of what and how big our cannabis justice problem is.


Currently, cannabis justice ​​scopes the problem of “cannabis criminalization & justice” solely through the experience of cis-gender, heterosexual men– which is de facto deemed the “normative” justice experience. This necessarily means that we are only exploring and considering solutions informed by the experience of cis-gender, heterosexual men. The consequence of such an exclusionary framework of analysis in research and discourse starts with the erasure of a vast cross-section of directly impacted people– and ends with real harm. If we exclude voices and experiences that should be included when discussing harm, healing, and justice—we fail before we begin. Exclusionary frameworks cause harm because they lead us to spend time, money, and energy on solutions that are based on an inaccurate and incomplete understanding of the problem we seek to solve. This creates an environment for harm to be perpetuated and compounded via the unintended consequences of well-intentioned solutions– a theme we have seen last too long in U.S. justice reform efforts. Exclusionary frameworks stifle movement efforts by excluding people, experiences, and narratives—truths to be reckoned with and considered.


Why is excluding Womxyn a problem?*


According to an Essie Justice Report “Because She is Powerful '' at least one in four womxyn have an incarcerated loved one.


Womxyn are the fastest-growing correctional population in the U.S., the carceral capital of the world, making the issue of womxyn’s incarceration one of global significance. Over the past 35 years, total arrests have risen 25% for womxyn, while decreasing by 33% for men, and the increase among womxyn is largely driven by drug-related offenses. During these 35 years, drug-related arrests increased by nearly 216% for women, compared to 48% for men. Indeed, we are missing a critical piece of the puzzle when we fail to consider gender as a unit of analysis of the cannabis justice problem. When womxyn experience policing and punishment, the consequences are far-reaching in ways that we have yet to fully understand and appreciate. The majority of incarcerated womxyn are primary care providers to children and are often the primary wage earner in the household because of the lasting impacts of the massive removal and incarceration of black and brown men. “Women with incarcerated loved ones include formerly incarcerated women. Women with incarcerated loved ones include currently incarcerated women. Women with incarcerated loved ones love and support people of all genders behind bars. Women with incarcerated loved ones are cisgender, transgender, and gender non-conforming.”


Why is excluding Queer & Trans communities a problem?


Queer and Trans people are overrepresented in incarceration & arrest rates, and these disparities increase dramatically when looking at the incarceration of womxyn & juvenile girls. When we take a closer look at the womxyn most impacted by carceral systems of policing and punishment we see that queer and non-binary womxyn are disproportionately impacted, making sexuality & gender identity factors that must be considered when trying to understand and solve criminal justice problems. 


  • The research and data we have show that womxyn are driving the higher representation of LGBTQ+ people in prisons and jails– 33.3% of womxyn in prison and 26.4% in jails identify as queer*. These numbers are stark compared to incarceration rates for “gay and bisexual” men– 5.5% in prison and 3.3% in jail– and are startling considering that “lesbian & bisexual” womxyn are measured to comprise only 8% of the general population.
  • When we look at minors in juvenile facilities– 40% of detained girls identify as LGBTQ+, in contrast with 14% of boys. 
  • In trans populations, one in five (21%) trans women have experienced incarceration at some point in their lives, as have nearly half (47%) of all Black trans people.


It is also worth noting that the best available data we have for measuring aggregate arrest & incarceration outcomes for womxyn and LGBTQ+  individuals is a decade old and was collected via research methods that do not take the experiences of impacted populations into consideration—meaning that the rates of impact were likely deflated in these original data sets, and we can assume they have gotten worse over time.


An inaccurate framing of what cannabis justice is for and who it is about dramatically hinders our ability to achieve collective movement goals of equitable justice, healing, and transformation.

It leads us to make poor investments of time, money, and energy. It leads us to overlook key experts and insights. It leads us to unintentionally harm those we as a movement are seeking to empower and support– making collaboration and trust-building difficult. 


Critical examination of normative frameworks (heteronormative, cis-normative, white, patriarchal) and the truths they privilege or suppress allow us to expand our view and see transformative solutions more clearly. This is an invitation to join this effort, to ask questions forgotten, to look for the people forgotten so that we can take full steps forward– together. 


*I intentionally use “womxyn” instead of “women” as a way to be inclusive of non-binary and trans womxyn, which is necessary for the accuracy and completeness of the discussion.

By Stephanie Shepard February 20, 2025
Roots of Resilience: African American Contributions to the Cannabis Movement Cannabis has deep historical roots, stretching back thousands of years across various cultures, including Africa, where it was used for medicinal and spiritual purposes. In pre-20th century America, hemp was cultivated primarily for fiber, but there is evidence of its use within some African American communities as well. These early connections laid a foundation for a complex relationship between African Americans and cannabis, one shaped by cultural significance, criminalization, activism, and entrepreneurship. This journey reveals a narrative of resilience and influence, showcasing the integral role African Americans have played in the evolution of cannabis culture and policy in the United States. The 1930s marked a pivotal shift with the enactment of the “Marihuana Tax Act” of 1937, which effectively criminalized cannabis. This legislation was rooted in racial undertones, strategically associating cannabis use with marginalized communities, particularly African Americans and Mexican immigrants. This racialized narrative was fueled by propaganda that painted cannabis users as violent and dangerous, reinforcing stereotypes that justified harsh legal consequences. The demonization of cannabis laid the groundwork for decades of systemic discrimination and criminalization that would disproportionately impact African American communities. Despite these challenges, African American cultural icons began to reshape the narrative around cannabis during the early 20th century. Louis Armstrong, an iconic jazz musician, openly discussed his cannabis use in interviews. His candor helped normalize its use within African American culture, particularly within the jazz scene, where cannabis became associated with creativity and artistic expression. Armstrong's influence extended beyond his music; he challenged societal norms by embracing cannabis as a tool for relaxation and inspiration, subtly defying the negative stereotypes perpetuated by mainstream society. His legacy continues to inspire artists who view cannabis as an integral part of creative expression and cultural identity. During the 1960s, amid the Civil Rights Movement, cannabis use emerged as a form of counterculture expression among Black Americans in urban areas. The plant became a symbol of resistance and freedom, aligning with the broader struggle against racial oppression. Yet, this association with rebellion also made cannabis a target of political agendas. In the 1970s, the Nixon Administration launched the “War on Drugs,” a policy initiative that disproportionately targeted Black communities. The criminalization of cannabis escalated, leading to skyrocketing arrest rates and significant incarceration disparities. Nixon's advisor, John Ehrlichman, later admitted that the policy aimed to disrupt Black communities and antiwar activists, revealing the racially motivated underpinnings of the drug war. The impact of the War on Drugs intensified during the 1980s under the Reagan Administration, which implemented even harsher drug laws, including mandatory minimum sentences for cannabis offenses. This era further stigmatized cannabis, exacerbating mass incarceration rates among African Americans. The resulting social and economic consequences devastated countless Black families and communities. However, even amid this adversity, resilience emerged. As the criminal justice system disproportionately targeted Black Americans, leaders and activists within these communities began organizing and advocating for change. By the 1990s, discussions around drug reform started gaining momentum, and African American activists played crucial roles in these conversations. They highlighted the racial disparities in drug enforcement and advocated for decriminalization and legalization of cannabis. This period marked the beginning of a shift in public perception, as activists linked cannabis reform to broader social justice issues. This became especially common in rap and hip-hop where many Black artists are advocates still today. In the early 2000s, the push for medical cannabis legalization gained traction in several states. African American activists were instrumental in these movements, advocating for patient rights and access to cannabis as medicine. By the following decade, significant progress was made as more states legalized cannabis for recreational use. This new landscape allowed Black Americans to participate in the industry as advocates and entrepreneurs. Yet, systemic barriers persisted, preventing equitable access to business opportunities. Wanda James emerged as a trailblazer during this time, becoming the first African American woman to own a dispensary in Colorado. Her business, Simply Pure, symbolizes resistance against the racial discrimination historically tied to cannabis prohibition. Wanda’s advocacy extends beyond entrepreneurship—she works tirelessly to influence cannabis legislation and ensure communities affected by criminalization benefit from legalization. Her leadership challenges the status quo and paves the way for a more inclusive industry. Meanwhile, Calvin Johnson, a former NFL superstar, co-founded Primitiv cannabis to highlight the therapeutic benefits of cannabis as a safer alternative to opioids commonly used by athletes. His advocacy challenges the stigma surrounding cannabis use in professional sports and emphasizes the need for reparative justice in communities disproportionately affected by past drug policies. Now in the present, the 2020s represent a pivotal moment in the cannabis movement, as legalization continues to expand and discussions about equity and justice gain momentum. States have implemented measures to address the injustices faced by Black Americans during the War on Drugs, including expungement of records and support for minority-owned cannabis businesses. Donte West is at the forefront of this movement, leveraging his experiences with cannabis criminalization to advocate for equity and systemic change. Through his work with the Last Prisoner Project, Donte inspires others to participate in the cannabis industry and advocate for justice. We have seen a surge of African American entrepreneurs who are redefining the cannabis industry. Jesce Horton, the founder of Lowd and Grand National, is committed to creating opportunities for historically excluded communities while influencing cannabis legislation to promote equitable access. Roger “Ganja Guru” Sterling uses his platform to uplift communities of color and challenge societal narratives around cannabis, while Gibran Washington, CEO of Ethos Cannabis, advocates for inclusivity and justice within the legal cannabis market. Their leadership reflects a new chapter of empowerment and success, breaking down barriers and ensuring diverse voices shape the industry's future, though there is plenty of work still needed to balance the scales of cannabis ownership. Organizations like The Hood Incubator and Free My Weedman are also crucial in paving the way for a more inclusive cannabis space. By supporting Black and Brown entrepreneurs, advocating for equitable policies, and raising awareness about unjust incarcerations, these initiatives work to rectify historical injustices and promote social equity. Kristal Bush, founder of Free My Weedman, combines her entrepreneurial spirit with community advocacy, influencing cannabis policies and empowering marginalized communities. As we honor the contributions of Black individuals and organizations during Black History Month, it is essential to recognize the ongoing struggle of those disproportionately criminalized for daring to be involved with cannabis. From Louis Armstrong’s cultural influence to modern-day entrepreneurs and activists, African Americans have shaped the cannabis movement at every turn. Their resilience and leadership challenge systemic injustice, demand equity, and celebrate cultural identity, paving the way for a better industry for all. To continue supporting this legacy, we can engage in conversations about equity, support Black-owned cannabis businesses, and advocate for policies that promote justice. By acknowledging the past and celebrating the strides of the present, we can build a future that honors the roots of resilience within the cannabis movement.
By Adrian Rocha February 7, 2025
o weeks into President Trump’s second term, cannabis has not surfaced as a leading issue in the early days of his new administration. However, several appointments and two executive orders signed during the first week of his second term will factor into the new administration’s drug and criminal justice policy approach. On his first day in office, President Trump signed an Executive Order (EO) rescinding a slew of EOs signed by former President Biden, including one effectively ending the use of private prisons to house federal prisoners . At the time President Biden signed the EO directing the Justice Department not to renew contracts with private prison firms, it was estimated that around 14,000 individuals incarcerated at the federal level were being held at private prisons. Additionally, President Trump signed another EO encouraging the Attorney General to “pursue the death penalty for all crimes of a severity demanding its use.” During his first term, President Trump voiced his support for seeking the death penalty for drug traffickers. This position was later formalized in a memo by then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions that encouraged federal prosecutors to seek the death penalty in cases involving large-scale drug traffickers. There were concerns at the time that the memo could be used to seek the death penalty for individuals involved in large-scale, state-legal cannabis operations; however, these fears never came to pass. The uncertainty around leadership further complicates the implementation and impact of these two executive orders. President Trump’s Attorney General nominee, Pam Bondi, who will oversee the Justice Department, was confirmed earlier this week. Additionally, the recent resignation of the Director of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has left the agency without a leader. During her confirmation hearing, Bonid reiterated her support for the continued implementation of the First Step Act, which could lead to additional releases from the BOP. In a letter to the newly minted Department of Government Efficiency, Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) also encouraged the federal government to look at scaling back the enforcement of federal cannabis laws, broader legalization, and the BOP to pursue compassionate release at greater scale to reduce the size and cost of the federal prison population. In her letter, Senator Warren cites a potential cost savings of $881 million if the BOP were to more zealous seek the release of individuals over age 65, are classified as presenting a minimum or low risk of recidivism, and are found not to be a danger to the safety of any person or the community. LPP has successfully advocated for the release of constituents incarcerated for cannabis via commutations and compassionate release motions, including nine in the first Trump administration. If the goal of a second Trump administration is to divert resources away from government largesse, ending unnecessary cannabis enforcement and granting clemency to those still incarcerated for cannabis is a great way to start.
By Adrian Rocha February 4, 2025
At the Last Prisoner Project (LPP), we know that those burdened by past cannabis convictions deserve true justice by getting their criminal records fully expunged and allowing individuals to move forward without the lifelong barriers. In Maryland, where Governor Wes Moore made history last year by issuing the nation’s most sweeping cannabis pardon order, we are now calling on lawmakers to take the next step: passing SB 432, the Expungement Reform Act of 2025 . A criminal record—whether for a conviction or even just an arrest—can create lasting obstacles to employment, housing, education, and other opportunities. The impact is not just personal; according to research from the Center for Economic and Policy Research, the U.S. economy loses between $78 and $87 billion annually due to employment barriers faced by people with criminal records. These collateral consequences compound the injustices of the War on Drugs and disproportionately affect communities already marginalized by systemic inequities. SB 432 seeks to simplify the expungement process, removing unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles and making it easier for individuals to clear their records. The bill will help thousands of Marylanders—many of whom have already served their sentences—access new opportunities and contribute fully to their communities. In 2024, Governor Wes Moore demonstrated bold leadership by granting pardons to over 175,000 Marylanders with low-level cannabis convictions. This was a critical step toward undoing decades of harm caused by cannabis prohibition. However, the reality is that while a pardon provides some relief, it does not automatically erase a record. Individuals must still navigate complex legal procedures to have their records expunged—a process that can be costly, time-consuming, and confusing. LPP urges the Maryland General Assembly to amend SB 432 to ensure that individuals granted full and unconditional pardons can have their records expunged automatically. Without this critical update, many of those pardoned under Governor Moore’s order will still face barriers to jobs, housing, and other essential services, despite having been officially forgiven by the state. Adrian Rocha, LPP's Policy Director, was recently appointed to the governor's roundtable on expungement, where we hope to provide further expertise on how to fully effectuate cannabis justice through retroactive relief. Research shows that record clearance not only benefits individuals but also strengthens communities. A recent study found that five years after receiving expungement, individuals were less likely to engage in criminal conduct than members of the general public. By increasing access to jobs, housing, and educational opportunities, expungement promotes community reintegration and stability—key factors in public safety. Moreover, Maryland has the opportunity to join 12 other states that have implemented state-initiated expungement for certain offenses, recognizing that individuals should not be required to navigate complex legal systems to obtain relief they are already entitled to. Maryland has already taken significant steps toward cannabis justice, but the job is not done. Passing SB 432 and ensuring automatic expungement for those granted clemency will solidify the state’s commitment to meaningful criminal justice reform. LPP urges the General Assembly to pass SB 432 and amend it to ensure that those who have received full pardons under Governor Moore’s order do not have to wait or fight for the relief they were promised. This is about more than policy—it’s about restoring dignity, removing barriers, and allowing Marylanders to build better futures. The time for action is now. Maryland’s commitment to justice through record relief must extend beyond pardons. Let’s finish what we started. Read our full testimony below:
Share by: